Here are additional high-profile cases of securities industry misconduct from international regulators and media reports, illustrating systemic risks and enforcement trends:
The SEC charged a New York man with trading on material nonpublic information (MNPI) obtained by eavesdropping on his wife, a senior executive at a publicly traded company. Between 2019–2021, Michael Shvartsman allegedly overheard confidential discussions about pending acquisitions and financial results, then directed trades through family accounts, generating $1.76 million in illicit profits . This case highlights emerging risks from remote work environments and the SEC’s focus on “opportunistic insider trading” involving personal relationships. Shvartsman pleaded guilty to criminal charges and was sentenced to 2 years in prison, while the SEC secured a parallel civil disgorgement order.
In a landmark case, the SEC charged a British national with hacking into five public companies’ systems to access MNPI before earnings announcements. The hacker allegedly reset executives’ passwords to obtain financial data, then traded securities through offshore accounts, netting $3.75 million. This case underscores the SEC’s expanding enforcement scope to include cyber-enabled fraud, with the DOJ filing parallel criminal charges for computer intrusion and wire fraud . The defendant, arrested in London, faces extradition to the U.S. for trial.
A former board member of a U.S. public company and four associates were charged with trading on MNPI about a pending private equity acquisition. The director allegedly shared confidential negotiation details with friends, who executed trades generating $2.2 million in profits. The SEC emphasized the “chain of trust” violations, noting the director’s fiduciary duty breach and the group’s sophisticated efforts to obscure trade patterns . All defendants settled, agreeing to disgorge profits and pay penalties totaling $3.1 million.
Hong Kong’s SFC fined CN Capital Management and its executives for systemic failures in managing employee trading. Over five years, two senior managers executed 3,188 personal trades without pre-approval, including 619 transactions violating the mandatory 30-day holding period and 996 trades mirroring the firm’s fund positions. Despite no direct client harm, the SFC deemed the violations a “flagrant disregard” for insider trading safeguards, highlighting the importance of procedural compliance even absent proven harm .
A UK jury convicted Stuart Bayes, a site manager at RPC Group plc, of insider trading for trading on MNPI about an impending takeover of BPI Group. Bayes purchased BPI shares ahead of the public announcement, netting £132,000 in profits, and encouraged another individual to trade. The FCA emphasized the “ordinary employee” risk, noting Bayes’ access to confidential deal information through his operational role. This case marked the FCA’s first successful retrial for insider dealing, resulting in a 2-year prison sentence .
The FCA, working with the National Crime Agency, arrested four individuals in London for a sophisticated insider trading and money laundering scheme. The group allegedly obtained MNPI through corrupt industry insiders, executed trades via shell companies, and laundered profits through luxury real estate. This case exemplifies the FCA’s focus on cross-border, organized crime networks exploiting securities markets .
The SEC sued Tesla CEO Elon Musk for failing to timely disclose his 9.2% stake in Twitter (now X) in 2022, violating Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act. The SEC argued Musk’s delayed filing misled investors about his control intentions. Musk’s legal team dismissed the charges as a “symbolic enforcement action,” noting the minimal financial penalty (under $1 million) compared to his $44 billion Twitter acquisition. This case highlights regulatory scrutiny over high-profile executives’ disclosure practices .
Technological Surveillance: Regulators increasingly use AI and big data to detect “shadow trading” patterns, such as cross-account correlations
Dual Penalties: Fines often exceed illicit gains, with disgorgement plus penalties averaging 3–5x profits in SEC cases .
Global Coordination: The SEC, FCA, and Hong Kong SFC share intelligence to track cross-border schemes, as seen in the hacker case .
Related topic:
